Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?

Read Integrative Case 1.4: An Institution-Based View of IPR Protection (p. 134)Answer Case Questions 1-3.

1. Why did the United States voluntarily turn from being an IPR violator to an IPR champion? 

2. How can the lessons from this episode of IPR history in the United States help inform today’s US–China IPR debate? 

3. From an institution-based view, when will China become serious in protecting IPR?