Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?Rudolph sues Spike and Jack for intentional infliction of emotional distress (a state tort claim) in federal court. Rudolph is a citizen of Washington State; Spike is a citizen of Oregon and Jack is a citizen of Oregon. Rudolph alleges $75,000 in damages. Spike moves for dismissal due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. What result?